5388 where does that leave etf investors itemid 127

Blog
     
SAVE AND SHARE Digg Del.icio.us Reddit Newsvine RSS


Where Does That Leave ETF Investors?

Written by Matthew Hougan

  
Thursday, 12 February 2009 22:36 (CET)

Let’s suppose you’re right, Paul. Let’s suppose that Messrs. Bernanke, Geithner and Summers are doomed to failure. Where does that leave investors?

I wonder specifically about the comment you attribute to Steve Keen, that there really is no way out of this except to “recognise that part of the vast stock of bubble-generated debt is not going to be repaid.” Isn’t the market already doing that?

The yields on Financials debt have risen, indicating higher risks of defaults. Goldman Sachs—perhaps the best positioned of the bunch—was able to place $2 billion in bonds at the end of January, but it had to pay a yield 500 basis points above Treasuries to do it. Other companies would have to pay even more. 

Meanwhile, Financials preferred stock indexes are yielding around 14%, on par with junk bonds. So despite the bailout(s), the market is clearly pricing in a risk that financial companies will default—that much of the debt simply will not be paid.

Meanwhile, there is no sign at all that the Treasury is having trouble borrowing. In fact, it can currently borrow money at 10-year Treasury yields of 2.76%. With those kinds of rates, if we as a society decide that some of the debt must be repaid to recapitalize the system, doesn’t it make sense to do so with the stronger balance sheet of the Treasury on our side? (And there’s no sign that this increase in borrowing is driving up inflation. The TIPS market is forecasting below-trend inflation for the next 10 years.)

I suppose what I’m asking is this: The market has already priced in a huge amount of failure. Bank equities have lost three-quarters of their value over the past year, and Financials-related debt is paying huge yields. Don’t you think the market has already discounted the likely scenario? Isn’t there a risk that it’s doing what it always does, and overshooting the mark on the downside just like it overshot on the upside?


More on this topic

(What's this?)

CHART OF THE DAY: HOW TO SOLVE A DEBT CRISIS


Consumer Debt In A Historical Context


The Never-Ending Waves of Debt


GOLDMAN SACHS TACTICAL PORTFOLIO STRATEGIES


Read more on
Debt,
Goldman Sachs Group
at Wikinvest

 




Latest comments on this feature



Post a Comment


Comment

(Limit 2,000

characters) 

*
Name:
*
E-mail:
*
Home page:


(optional)

Type in the displayed characters:
Email follow-up comments to my e-mail address
 


The views expressed by Paul Amery, Jim Wiandt and Matt Hougan are for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation for any security.

[yasr_overall_rating size="large"]
error: Alert: Content is protected !!