Most Popular Articles

Opinion & Analysis



Print this article


ETFs: The Right Product For The Job?

Written by Rebecca Hampson

 –  February 22, 2013

 

Sleep adds: “We started ‘blending’ (passive and active) products eight years ago and we started diversifying away from ETFs when Vanguard came to London four years ago. This is when we looked at the tracker industry, but the problem for the tracker industry is that they have no marketing budget so not enough people know they are out there.”

“There is a lot of bravado from people saying they like being able to trade intraday, but the reality is the opposite. Long term investors put stuff away for five to seven years.”

According to Sleep, until recently the FTSE AllShare tracker was 10 bps and the cheapest ETF was the iShares Ftse Allshare at 40 bps. You may not pay stamp duty on the ETF as you do on tracker, but while the first year cost on the tracker is 60bps and then 10bps thereafter, the ETF is 40bps every year.

“ETFs are good for short term trading,” Sleep says. “But, for anything longer than 18 months, a tracker is better.”

Part of the firm’s core principles—that the investment process is the same whether you have £5,000 (€5,731) or £5 million (€5.7 million)—has led them to look for the best way to access markets. It has prompted them to use smart beta.

Sleep says: “We like it and we use it. There are inefficiencies in the indexes and this offers an opportunity for investors to get away from a cap-weighted indices. It is then up to the investor to choose what type of smart beta they want.”

Despite this, both Stewart and Sleep are keen to impress that they always return to the core principles of the business.

Stewart says: “We are trying to get away from the idea that if you are poor, you don’t get the best service. There will, of course, be variations and differences from client to client though,” says Stewart. “The whole aim of the business has been to provide investment portfolios which are straight forward that people can see and understand.”

In order to provide the best service, the firm collaborates with Chicago-based investment advisor firm Ibbotson for all its long-term-view (portfolio) work, they attend regular board meetings. The teams constantly review their strategic asset allocation portfolio and run a quarterly tactical asset allocation meeting with a board of independent advisers who have particular expertise in a certain area—this also includes Ibbotson.

They are more hands on with short-term asset allocation and have a day-to-day portfolio management team—and this is where they feel they add value.

“We are able to make changes as we go along so there is no heavy re-weighting or violent movements. It helps in reducing the risk and lowering costs,” Sleep says.

However, Stewart credits 7IM’s success with following three simple rules: “Rule one, don’t lose the stock. Rule two, refer to rule one. Rule three, try and grow it over time.

“Our task is to be as steady and sturdy as possible. It means that if you are a lower growth world, we have to look at every item and try to work out where we can lower costs,” says Stewart.

He adds: “When we want to be more aggressive, it is done in terms of asset allocation rather than taking bigger bets overall. We can be accused of being a bit dull, slow and steady. You can add sex and violence later if that is what you want.”



Comment Using:



blog comments powered by Disqus

 




Submit

 

Europe Blog

Tuesday, February 19, 2013 17:45 (CET)

Posted By Paul Baiocchi

Paul Baiocchi

Hedge fund veteran’s sale of the world’s largest gold ETF has caused raised eyebrows, but it shouldn’t

More











ADVERTISING

[yasr_overall_rating size="large"]
error: Alert: Content is protected !!